>From: "Brad Pierce" <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com> > >Because &&& allows the > > expression 'matches' pattern &&& ... > >syntax, it can do *more* than a general-purpose short-circuit logical >AND. How does its greater generality make it inappropriate for a more >restrictive purpose? It is not more general. Nikhil said that it is only allowed at the top level of a conditional. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Tue Aug 15 10:21:06 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 15 2006 - 10:21:13 PDT