>A more natural syntax for linearized short-circuiting would be to add >defaults to the existing ?: syntax. More natural to whom? As a language design exercise there is a certain elegance to it, and I am happy to acknowledge that. But as a practical matter, you would have had to make this suggestion 30 years ago and get K&R to agree with it. Then C and Verilog coders might find it more natural. Are you seriously proposing this as an alternative to guaranteeing short-circuit execution for && and ||, and if so, why? Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Fri Aug 11 14:40:46 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 11 2006 - 14:40:52 PDT