Hi, > b) In terms of i/o (and VCD), the main questions involve how to bound > the > problem since, assumbably, no one wants to deal with dynamic types > in > those domains. [Shalom] I'm not sure what this was referring to, but in any case, I question the assumption. > c) What "%m" is supposed to do for parameterized class specializations. > > Implementations certainly have diverged on this and we really should > > get something definitive stated. [Shalom] This is Mantis 672. In addition to all the cases explicitly mentioned there, we should add more generally: unnamed scopes, dynamic scopes, $unit. > Enumerated Types > Issues: 916, 917, 1429 > Primary Owner: Matt [Shalom] Add 1483. > Compiler Directives > Issues: 1052, 1053, 1084, 1119, 1202, 1292, 1333, 1338, 1339, 1341 > Primary Owner: Shalom [Shalom] Add 1208, 1397, 1478. > > + Proposed Next Meeting Date: July 10th [Shalom] NOTE THE CHANGE ! > 05/22/2006 Brad search for non-local or "non local" in LRM. File > another > issue to correct if found. [Shalom] No such instances. "nonlocal" appears 2x in 1800 and 1x in 1364.Received on Sun Jun 18 01:01:04 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jun 18 2006 - 01:01:22 PDT