Re: [sv-bc] parameterized structures

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce_at_.....>
Date: Thu Jun 15 2006 - 22:04:16 PDT

Are struct types really just syntactic sugar for a simple kind of class?

 

If so, could we explicitly define structs in terms of classes and get
the proposed parameterized struct types for free from the existing
definition of parameterized classes?

 

-- Brad

Received on Thu Jun 15 22:04:24 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: [sv-bc] parameterized structures"
Previous message: Joginder Singh: "[sv-bc] Email vote: Closes Midnight June 16"
Maybe in reply to: Feldman, Yulik: "[sv-bc] parameterized structures"
Next in thread: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: [sv-bc] parameterized structures"
Reply: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: [sv-bc] parameterized structures"
Reply: Kevin Cameron: "Re: [sv-bc] parameterized structures"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 15 2006 - 22:04:32 PDT