RE: [sv-bc] E-mail Vote: Closes Midnight June 16

I vote Yes on all except 1216 and 1378, with a comment on 1380.


> SVDB  515 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.verilog.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=515
> 
> SVDB  969 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.verilog.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=969
> 
> SVDB  981 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.verilog.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=981
> 
> SVDB 1005 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.verilog.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1005
> 
> SVDB 1137 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.verilog.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1137
> 
> SVDB 1149 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.verilog.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1149
> 
> SVDB 1154 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.verilog.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1154
> 
> SVDB 1216 ___Yes   _x_No
> http://www.verilog.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1216

[Shalom] This issue should be dealt with together with Mantis 204.
It should just be called 'scope resolution operator', as it is in the
index, instead of 'class scope resolution operator' as it is in the
text, or even 'package scope resolution operator'. Mantis 204 points out
that this operator can also be used with $unit. Mantis 204 also claims
it can be used with a program, but I am not sure this is correct.
Nevertheless, I propose that 1216 be resolved by changing the text in
8.10.1, 19.2.1, and 19.3 from 'class scope resolution operator' to
simply 'scope resolution operator' (without the prefix "package").


> 
> SVDB 1227 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.verilog.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1227
> 
> SVDB 1332 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.verilog.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1332
> 
> SVDB 1377 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.verilog.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1377
> 
> SVDB 1378 ___Yes   _x_No
> http://www.verilog.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1378

[Shalom] Agree with Gord. There are two 'smart quotes' that should be
simple apostrophes.

> 
> SVDB 1380 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.verilog.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1380

[Shalom] Comment. Please add a sentence which emphasizes that the
correction applies after the "or" sign as well as at the beginning,
otherwise the 2nd correction on each line is liable to be missed.

Shalom