RE: [sv-bc] Is #4.2step legal?

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Mon May 22 2006 - 08:41:36 PDT
>From: "Rich, Dave" <Dave_Rich@mentor.com>

>[DR>] 4. Get rid of it altogether by fixing the construct that required
>it in the first place, clocking blocks.

Stepping back and solving the broader problem sounds good to me.  I just
don't know enough about clocking blocks to propose that.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com
Received on Mon May 22 08:41:25 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 22 2006 - 08:41:40 PDT