[sv-bc] RE: Mark Hartoog Issue Review

> From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
>
> If you regard 902-907 as enhancement requests, you should 
> change their classification. Do you have access rights?

I could not find anything to change to enhancement.
 
> 1074: Although it does involve differing implementations, it 
> should never occur in a real design, so I personally would 
> not call it 'major'.

I agree it should not occur, but it is easy for someone to do
this by accident.

> 1078: Looks to me that it should be major as it does involve 
> differing implementations and does occur.

I did not consider this major, because it only affects the formatting
of the output, not the actual results of the simulation. Now formatting
of the output is an issue, if you are diffing the output from different 
simulators. 

From the perspective of system verilog, I don't think the LRM  
specifies the simulation time output from assertions, unique/priority
if/case
in enough detail that you can expect the output to be identical. With
1364 
it may have been the goal to standardize the simulation run time output
to 
the level that the output can be diffed.