[sv-bc] Re: My SV-BC issue reviews

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce_at_.....>
Date: Sun Apr 09 2006 - 11:06:41 PDT
30 and 1220, regarding name spaces, are raised to the same Major
severity as 1214, which is also about name spaces.

 

986, regarding Verilog configurations, is raised to Major.  Related
issues are

 

    http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/107.html
    http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/108.html
    http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/350.html
    http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/514.html

 

1366, regarding variables as module path destinations, is raised to
Major.

 

1007 and 1366 should be marked as duplicates of each other.   I raised
them to Major, to make sure this recurring issue gets discussed by
SV-BC, even if only to lower the severity again.

 

There were three items about gaps in the language, which I didn't mark
as major, because they are officially enhancements.  But they are
definitely places where SV has room for improvement.

 

    http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=96

    http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=75

    http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=42

 

-- Brad

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
Received on Sun Apr 9 11:06:56 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Apr 09 2006 - 11:07:19 PDT