RE: [sv-ec] RE: [sv-bc] RE: Can a function contain a fork/join/any/none?

As a user, I have also often thought so. How about it, vendors?

At one time, I actually recommended rerunning simulations on a different
vendor's simulator as a way of possibly exposing such problems.

> I've often thought that a useful (and amusing)
> switch to have in an implementation would be "-
> randomize_scheduling"
> which would actually go out of its way to permute the "natural"
> scheduling order.  This would expose huge numbers of bad
> assumptions that designers make regarding simulation
> semantics.


Shalom