Re: [sv-bc] Union assignment patterns

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce_at_.....>
Date: Tue Feb 28 2006 - 08:46:09 PST
>> What about packed union types?
>
>Why the semantics will be different for the packed union types?

That's exactly what I was asking.  Why does the LRM single out unpacked
union types in the sentence I quoted, and where does it define the
initialization of packed union types?

-- Brad
Received on Tue Feb 28 08:46:18 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 28 2006 - 08:46:48 PST