RE: [sv-bc] Agenda: Feb 27 SV-BC Errata Committee Meeting

Brad,

What time is the conference call?  I called in, but only get a message that
the conference has not been initiated.

Stu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Sutherland
stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
+1-503-692-0898
  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On 
> Behalf Of Brad Pierce
> Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 10:06 PM
> To: sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Agenda: Feb 27 SV-BC Errata Committee Meeting
> 
> We should able to quickly resolve the following failed e-mail 
> vote items
> without modifying any proposals
> 
>    http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=919
>    http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=962
>    http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1297
>    http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1298
> 
> and possibly also
> 
>    http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=882
> 
> I've added friendly-amended proposals for the following failed e-mail
> vote items
> 
>    http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=911
>    http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=946
>    http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1138
> 
> The following two failed e-mail vote items do not yet have
> consensus-building new formal proposals, and they are not 
> Top-N priority
> items, so they will be tabled
> 
>    http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=949
>    http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1255
> 
> Also, we need to hear more from Shalom and Stu about resolved item 
> 
>    http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=658
> 
> and the report about its implementation in
> 
>    http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/4048.html
> 
> -- Brad
> 
> 
> 
>