It's a somewhat different situation, but I certainly find it a nuisance that the Verilog-AMS LRM is a separate document from the 1364 LRM on which it is based; the AMS LRM includes many fundamental Verilog items only by reference, which makes it hard to look things up. So, I support doing the merge sooner rather than later. -Geoffrey Stuart Sutherland wrote: > > You mention you have colleagues that use the LRMs, but have you asked them > whether they would prefer working with a single LRM or having to refer to > two different LRMs for the same language? -- Geoffrey J. Coram, Ph.D. Staff CAD Engineer Analog Devices, Inc. 804 Woburn St., MS-422, Tel (781) 937-1924 Wilmington, MA 01887 Fax (781) 937-1014Received on Fri Feb 3 09:46:10 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 03 2006 - 09:46:59 PST