Re: [sv-bc] Opinion on merging of P1364 and P1800

Non-member submission from Faisal Haque

 

________________________________

From: On Behalf Of Faisal Haque (fhaque)
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 1:46 PM
To: Karen Pieper; sv-bc@eda.org; sv-ac@eda.org; sv-ec@eda.org;
sv-cc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] RE: [sv-ac] Opinion on merging of P1364 and P1800

 

Karen,

What is the rationale for merging the two LRMs?

Can someone explain.

-Faisal

 

	 

	
________________________________


	From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf
Of Karen Pieper
	Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 5:41 PM
	To: sv-bc@eda.org; sv-ac@eda.org; sv-ec@eda.org; sv-cc@eda.org
	Subject: [sv-ac] Opinion on merging of P1364 and P1800

	Hi, all, 

	In the P1800 meeting last week, the Working Group asked for each
of the SV-* committees to provide an opinion on whether or not to merge
the P1364 and the P1800 LRMs into one LRM.  They are interested in your
opinions on:

	1)  How much time will it take us to merge the relevant parts of
the LRM 
	2)  When you recommend merging the LRM (now, toward the end of
the current 2 year revision cycle, next LRM, never)... 
	3)  Any other questions or comments that the committees
recommend the study group consider in their decision to develop the next
PAR.

	Committee chairs, I would appreciate it if you would develop a
response reflective of your committee's opinion and forward it to me
after your next committee meeting, preferably no later than the 15th of
February.

	Thank you, 

	Karen Pieper