Wow. I would rather that P1800 undo allowing unnamed blocks to contain declarations. What were they thinking... If we can't undo that bit of oversight, then I would go for following the convention of generate. -- On May 17 2005 at 16:31, Gordon Vreugdenhil sent a message: > To: sv-bc@eda.org > Subject: "[sv-bc] Naming of unnamed sequential blocks" > P1800 allows sequential unnamed blocks to have declarations. There > is no naming convention specified for pli access meaning that vendors > will almost certainly do varying things. For unnamed generate blocks, > 1364-2005 defines an "external name" format and rules for naming > each unnamed block. Do other people think that we should follow > the same kind of naming convention for sequential blocks? I think > we should. If others agree, we might want to at least brainstorm > about some variants to the "external name" rules for sequential > blocks. > > Gord. > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Gordon Vreugdenhil, Staff Engineer 503-685-0808 > Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com >Received on Tue May 17 20:50:24 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 17 2005 - 20:50:33 PDT