Greg Jaxon wrote: [...] > In the light of this reading (from 1364-2005, but it doesn't look new) > Gord's objection doesn't stand up. There is a newline character > between " `incr NC" and "var", which should indicate that the option to > repeat count was declined! Ah - good point. I forgot about that detail. Still, is there any good reason for not making this look like a normal macro invocation? If we don't do that, all occurrences will have to be on separate lines (was that the intent?). Gord. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil, Staff Engineer 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.comReceived on Tue May 3 13:00:53 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 03 2005 - 13:00:58 PDT