>The right-hand side must be unsized, real or integral according to >the paragraph after the first example in 22.2. Thanks, that is the restriction I was looking for. I guess I should have read further. I'm not clear what 'unsized' means here, since I can't think of any situation where that wouldn't also be 'integral'. > I think that's >not restrictive enough and that 'integral' should be replaced >with 'simple bit-vector type'. I think it would be OK as long as the parameter doesn't actually get the type of the value, but instead becomes a logic vector of the same size. Aside from leaving out reals, that's what the earlier text says. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Fri Apr 22 17:22:19 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 22 2005 - 17:23:16 PDT