RE: [sv-bc] Action item: Update item 548

From: Rich, Dave <Dave_Rich_at_.....>
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:01:55 PST
This is allowed. In fact, there used to be an explicit rule that said
.name and .* could not be used in the same instance, but it was removed.
Therefore, since it is syntactically legal, and there is no semantic
restriction making it illegal, it is legal.

Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Steven
> Sharp
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 3:34 PM
> To: sv-bc@eda.org; Vreugdenhil, Gordon
> Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Action item: Update item 548
> 
> Note that this might be a reason to allow mixing .name implicit port
> connections with .* implicit port connections (which I don't think is
> currently allowed).
> 
> Steven Sharp
> sharp@cadence.com
Received on Fri Apr 1 16:02:04 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 16:02:20 PST