[sv-bc] type compatibility for unions?

From: Francoise Martinolle <fm_ f rom>
Date: Tue Feb 15 2005 - 19:10:27 PST
The type compatibility description seems to be missing the rules for packed
unions.
I think that rule 5 of type equivalence should be talking about packed
unions as well:
 
Packed arrays, packed structures, and built-in integral types are equivalent
if they contain the same number

of total bits, are either all 2-state or all 4-state, and are either all
signed or all unsigned. Note that if any bit of

a packed structure or union is 4-state, the entire structure or union is
considered 4-state.

 
Received on Tue Feb 15 19:10:31 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 15 2005 - 19:10:53 PST