Re: [sv-bc] DataTypes: Revision 3 in PDF

From: Steven Sharp <sharp@cadence.com>
Date: Fri Nov 19 2004 - 11:13:01 PST

OK, this looks good to me (including matching my intended bolding of "var"
and italicizing of "port kind" in 18.8).

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com
Received on Fri Nov 19 11:13:06 2004

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Neil Korpusik: "Re: [sv-bc] RE: Friendly amendment wording for 109"
Previous message: Greg Jaxon: "Re: [sv-bc] DataTypes: status of "var" proposal"
Maybe in reply to: Kathy McKinley: "[sv-bc] DataTypes: Revision 3 in PDF"
Next in thread: Clifford E. Cummings: "[sv-bc] DataTypes - Please vote no"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 19 2004 - 11:13:09 PST