[sv-bc] Proposal for 216

From: Steven Sharp <sharp@cadence.com>
Date: Fri Nov 05 2004 - 12:46:03 PST

I have uploaded a proposal for 216, about default initial values for enums.
Because of Mark's comments, the proposal contains two variations: one that
just changes 4-state enums, and the other that changes all enums.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com
Received on Fri Nov 5 12:46:10 2004

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Maidment, Matthew R: "[sv-bc] Agenda: Nov 8 SV-BC CC"
Previous message: Greg Jaxon: "Re: [sv-bc] Errata in SV 3.1a LRM Section 18.4: inconsistent use of error and warning"
Next in thread: Neil Korpusik: "Re: [sv-bc] Proposal for 216"
Reply: Neil Korpusik: "Re: [sv-bc] Proposal for 216"
Maybe reply: Steven Sharp: "Re: [sv-bc] Proposal for 216"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 05 2004 - 12:46:14 PST