Re: [sv-bc] sv 3.1a section 3.1 on truncation warnings

From: Steven Sharp <sharp@cadence.com>
Date: Fri Jul 16 2004 - 14:52:46 PDT

>reg a;
>
>initial a = 0 ;
>
>0, being an unsized, unbased integer constant, is expected to be nominally 32
>bits. a is 1 bit.
>
>Is it really intended that such a statement cause a warning?
>
>There are frequently hundreds of such statements in a design.

I have seen designs with millions of such statements, created by testbench
generation tools.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com
Received on Fri Jul 16 14:52:50 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 16 2004 - 14:53:38 PDT