Re: [sv-bc] email voting on Cliff's proposal


Subject: Re: [sv-bc] email voting on Cliff's proposal
From: Rishiyur S. Nikhil (nikhil@bluespec.com)
Date: Wed Jan 07 2004 - 13:13:07 PST


[ X ] I agree with the changes made in the attached proposal

Nikhil

Srouji, Johny wrote:

> This is a reminder that I need to get your voting by end of the day. So
> far, I have only received three votes.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> --- Johny.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Srouji, Johny
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 06, 2004 10:50 AM
> *To:* sv-bc@eda.org
> *Cc:* Srouji, Johny
> *Subject:* [sv-bc] email voting on Cliff's proposal
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Cliff has verified there is no impact by the proposed changes in his
> proposal by existing changes in draft2 of SV 3.1a. Attached is the
> modified document based on the review and proposed changes we discussed
> in the meeting yesterday.
>
> As agreed in our meeting yesterday, I am sending this proposal for email
> voting. Based on the attendance rule of 3 out of 4 last meetings,
> following are the voting members:
>
>
>
> Matt Maidment
>
> Brad Pierce
>
> Karen Pieper
>
> Johny Srouji
>
> Dave Rich
>
> Francoise Martinolle
>
> Cliff Cummings
>
> Mark Hartoog
>
> Doug Warmke
>
> Rishiyur Nikhil
>
> Stu Sutherland
>
> Peter Flake
>
>
>
> Note: as a chair, I don’t get to vote unless there is a tie
>
>
> All voting members: please send me your voting decision no later than
> *Wed 5:00 pm PST*. Please mark-up one of the following options:
>
>
>
> [ ] I agree with the changes made in the attached proposal
>
> [ ] I oppose to the changes made in the attached proposal
>
> [ ] I abstain
>
>
>
> Voting members who will not send me their reply by the above deadline,
> will not be counted in – (you are highly encouraged to send me your reply).
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> --- Johny.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jan 07 2004 - 13:13:51 PST