Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Erratum and PROPOSAL (BNF) -- timeunits_declaration
From: Peter Flake (Peter.Flake@synopsys.com)
Date: Wed Nov 19 2003 - 08:37:21 PST
Brad,
This requires some wording to say what happens if a timeunits_declaration
occurs half way through a module but not at the start.
Are the delays before the timeunits_declaration scaled according to the
previously valid declaration or to the forward reference? I would think
the latter.
Peter.
At 19:22 13/11/2003 -0800, Brad Pierce wrote:
>The current BNF does not allow timeunits_declarations
>in modules, interfaces, etc., except as the first item.
>But this clearly conflicts with 18.6 of the LRM.
>(Repeated timeunits_declarations are very useful
>as constancy checks, especially when the time scope
>is split among multiple files.)
>
>The attached proposal fixes that.
>
>-- Brad
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Nov 19 2003 - 08:45:42 PST