Re: [sv-bc] RE: Connecting generated interface instances

From: Gordon Vreugdenhil <gordonv@model.com>
Date: Tue Feb 24 2015 - 06:48:16 PST
I don't think that follows.

A vendor may support something (kind of, sort of).  But
is it regular with other features?  Does it have exceptions?
Are users ever surprised?  Are there bugs that keep
"moving around"?

Complexity and ambiguity lead to fragility and irregularity
in implementation.  Can vendors get something together
for an eval or bug response?  Sure.  Does that mean it
isn't a major on-going problem?  No.

Gord

On 2/24/15 6:41 AM, Bresticker, Shalom wrote:
>
> Which seems to indicate that it is not really such a problem…
>
> I think we gave up trying to insist it was illegal some years ago 
> because you already can legally access the same information other ways.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. 

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Vreugdenhil                                503-685-0808
Verification Technologies, Mentor Graphics        gordonv@model.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Feb 24 06:48:47 2015

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 24 2015 - 06:48:52 PST