[sv-bc] Re: [sv-ec] RE: Scoping Next 1800 Effort - Due EO February

I suggest
    Covergroup extensibility
            http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2117
            http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4703

    Enhance default bins
            http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4698

    Clarify soft constraints
            http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4927
            http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4928




I have a few more that do not have Mantis yet; plan to add them to Mantis
and this thread soon.


Mark







On 2/6/15 3:06 PM, "Steven Sharp" <sharp@cadence.com> wrote:

>If we are considering minor enhancements like these that Brad suggests, I
>would add
>
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2502
>
>Including the ability to declare virtual interfaces for interfaces that
>have interface ports, as long as those interface ports are declared with
>full parameterization, and any interface ports in those interfaces meet
>the same requirements.
>
>We have users interested in this capability.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad
>Pierce
>Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 9:38 PM
>To: sv-bc@eda.org; sv-ec@eda.org
>Subject: [sv-bc] RE: Scoping Next 1800 Effort - Due EO February
>
>Hi Matt,
>
>If SV-BC and SV-EC re-open, I would suggest
>
>   Interop with IEEE Std 1735-2014 (encryption)
>
>              http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=5015
>
>   NBA to static variable across 'ref static' function port
>
>              http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2583
>              http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4607
>
>   Dynamic indexing of arrayed instances
>
>              http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4764
>              http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=4763
>
>-- Brad
>
>[In reply to http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/11665.html and
>http://www.eda.org/sv-ec/hm/8539.html .]
>
>
>
>--
>This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
>MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
>
>
>
>
>-- 
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.
>
>
>


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.