[sv-bc] RE: Q: [N] array bounds legal for unpacked but not packed arrays?

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com>
Date: Tue Sep 30 2014 - 12:56:36 PDT

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=325


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Received on Tue Sep 30 12:57:04 2014

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bresticker, Shalom: "[sv-bc] RE: Q: [N] array bounds legal for unpacked but not packed arrays?"
Previous message: Steven Sharp: "[sv-bc] RE: Q: [N] array bounds legal for unpacked but not packed arrays?"
In reply to: Bresticker, Shalom: "[sv-bc] RE: Q: [N] array bounds legal for unpacked but not packed arrays?"
Next in thread: Bresticker, Shalom: "[sv-bc] RE: Q: [N] array bounds legal for unpacked but not packed arrays?"
Reply: Bresticker, Shalom: "[sv-bc] RE: Q: [N] array bounds legal for unpacked but not packed arrays?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 30 2014 - 12:57:08 PDT