RE: [sv-bc] Signed after typedef

From: Rich, Dave <Dave_Rich@mentor.com>
Date: Wed May 21 2014 - 14:13:09 PDT
And type T is implicitly unsigned. There are no rules to explain how you could override the signedness of a type.

From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 5:18 AM
To: Radosław Nawrot; 'SV_BC List'
Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Signed after typedef

I don't see that the BNF allows it.

type_identifier can be followed by packed_dimension, but I don't see that it can be followed by 'signing'.

Shalom

From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org<mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org> [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Rados?aw Nawrot
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 15:02
To: 'SV_BC List'
Subject: [sv-bc] Signed after typedef

Hi,
I have a code:

typedef reg T;
T signed [1:0] r;

Is it legal ?
I cannot find reason why nobody supports it

Regards,
Radek


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed May 21 14:13:33 2014

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 21 2014 - 14:13:44 PDT