RE: [sv-bc] Connection of parameterized interfaces

But is it legal according to the LRM?

From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 18:32
To: sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Connection of parameterized interfaces

In practice interface instances with overridden parameters are often connected to ports declared with an explicit named interface instead of with the generic 'interface' keyword. I think it's better style to use 'interface.mp<http://interface.mp>', as in http://bradpierce.wordpress.com/2012/05/20/modports-are-fundamental-interfaces-are-just-their-implementations/ , but I also think it's legal to use an explicit interface name, as most real designs do.

-- Brad


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.