[sv-bc] RE: Agenda: Sep 26 SV-BC Meeting

> See Shalom's reflector post:
>
> http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/11176.html

[SB] I don't see much point in discussing this. There has been no feedback so far, and even if I would get some feedback tomorrow, it would not leave time to approve anything by Oct 1.

> + 1067 - http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1067
>
> See http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/11215.html
>
> Jonathan Bromley posted a proposal that seems to overlap with Mantis 1144.

[SB] 1144 is a different issue. 1144 deals with whether reading or writing a non-existent or out of bounds address should generate an error or a warning. Mantis 1067 does not touch that point. 1067 leaves the existing specification without change about that.

Regards,
Shalom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.