Date: Thu Aug 04 2011 - 07:40:32 PDT
I agree with Dave that syntax as complicated as this should not be in
comments. I think we should extend either Syntax 35-1 or Syntax 5-3.
From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad
Pierce
Sent: 02 August 2011 20:22
To: Rich, Dave
Cc: SystemVerilog CC DWG (sv-cc@eda.org); sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Mantis 3087 Uses of comment pragmas instead of
attributes
Can the impoverished attribute syntax of Syntax 5-3 really carry the weight?
Why not use/extend the `pragma directive of Syntax 22-8?
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Rich, Dave <Dave_Rich@mentor.com> wrote:
Why does this proposal continue to promote the use comment pragmas instead
of attributes? I thought the use of attributes is to be encouraged because
you can't construct macros to deal with comments. Or are we giving up on
attributes?
Dave Rich
Verification Technologist
Mentor Graphics Corporation
<http://www.twitter.com/dave_59> Description: Twitter-32
<http://go.mentor.com/drich> Description: Technorati-32
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
