[sv-bc] RE: Email Vote: Respond by 8AM PDT Wed Apr 20

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker@intel.com>
Date: Tue Apr 19 2011 - 23:27:50 PDT

On Mantis 2982, the examples in 20.15.1 cannot be changed to use $urandom, because the subclause is describing the $random function. At least the first example needs to use $random because it is generating signed results. The second example could be changed to recommend using $urandom if you want an unsigned result.

25.7.2 can use $urandom.

(The reference to $urandom in 6.8 should be in code font.)

There are uses of $random in 8.5, 8.7, 8.18, and 25.9.2 that it makes sense to convert to $urandom.

Regards,
Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Rich, Dave
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 8:53 AM
> To: Maidment, Matthew R; SV-BC
> Subject: [sv-bc] RE: Email Vote: Respond by 8AM PDT Wed Apr 20
>
> I am in favor of all except 2982
>
> $urandom should now be used instead of $random, and any proposal that
> touches existing cases of this should have this changed.
> Also, the example in 25.7.2 should be made legal by the following:
>
> module cpuMod(interface b);
> enum {read, write} instr ;
> logic [7:0] raddr = $urandom();
>
>
> For 3384, I agree the wording should use 'packed arrays'. I also agree
> that you do need to say that a 1-bit scalar is unsigned. Otherwise you
> could wind up with a variable that can only take on the values 0 and -1
> by default.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Maidment, Matthew R
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 1:02 AM
> To: SV-BC
> Subject: [sv-bc] Email Vote: Respond by 8AM PDT Wed Apr 20
>
>
> -You have until 8am PDT, Wednesday April 20, 2011 to respond -An issue
> passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible voters
> respond with a YES vote.
> -If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a
> reason.
> The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference
> call.
> -Note: The proposed action is captured in the bug note
> (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.).
>
> As of the April 11, 2011 meeting, the eligible voters are:
>
> Steven Sharp
> Francoise Martinolle
> Tom Alsop
> Shalom Bresticker
> Dave Rich
> Gordon Vreugdenhil
> Alex Gran
> Arnab Saha
> Eric Coffin
> Brad Pierce
> Mark Hartoog
>
> SVDB 2595 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2595
>
> SVDB 2976 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2976
>
> SVDB 2977 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2977
>
> SVDB 2982 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2982
>
> SVDB 3026 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3026
>
> SVDB 3062 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3062
>
> SVDB 3274 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3274
>
> SVDB 3362 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3362
>
> SVDB 3384 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3384

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Apr 19 23:30:06 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 19 2011 - 23:30:12 PDT