[sv-bc] RE: Email Vote: Respond by 8AM PDT Wed Apr 20

From: Steven Sharp <sharp@cadence.com>
Date: Tue Apr 19 2011 - 15:15:21 PDT

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Maidment, Matthew R
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 4:02 AM
To: SV-BC
Subject: [sv-bc] Email Vote: Respond by 8AM PDT Wed Apr 20

-You have until 8am PDT, Wednesday April 20, 2011 to respond -An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible voters respond with a YES vote.
-If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a reason.
 The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference call.
-Note: The proposed action is captured in the bug note
       (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.).

As of the April 11, 2011 meeting, the eligible voters are:

Steven Sharp
Francoise Martinolle
Tom Alsop
Shalom Bresticker
Dave Rich
Gordon Vreugdenhil
Alex Gran
Arnab Saha
Eric Coffin
Brad Pierce
Mark Hartoog

SVDB 2595 _X_Yes ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2595

SVDB 2976 _X_Yes ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2976

SVDB 2977 _X_Yes ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2977

SVDB 2982 _X_Yes ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2982

Though there is another error in this example. It assigns an integer (the result of $random) to an enum variable, which is a violation of the type rules.

SVDB 3026 _X_Yes ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3026

My PDF reader is showing the system function names and parentheses in the first set of changes in red, which might confuse the editor.

SVDB 3062 _X_Yes ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3062

SVDB 3274 _X_Yes ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3274

SVDB 3362 _X_Yes ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3362

SVDB 3384 _X_Yes ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3384

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Apr 19 15:15:51 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 19 2011 - 15:15:56 PDT