No, it's a semantic issue, because the current BNF can already accept
your example, if we agree that the 'interface' keyword in a generic
interface_port_header can stand in for, not only an interface
instance, but also for a *scope* of an interface instance.
-- Brad
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Brad Pierce <brad_pierce@acm.org> wrote:
> Jonathan,
>
> On p. 29 of that presentation ( http://bit.ly/eipdSE ) , you show a
> very clever trick of using generic interface port declarations to
> receive a generated modport.
>
> I think the current BNF in A.1.3 (interface_port_header) never
> contemplated the possibility of generate scopes, and to make your
> trick work within the official standard, we'd need to correct that
> oversight.
>
> -- Brad
>
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jan 11 16:51:00 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 11 2011 - 16:51:05 PST