RE: [sv-bc] Equality operators on unpacked arrays

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com>
Date: Wed Nov 24 2010 - 14:28:55 PST

That sentence doesn’t use "provided" as an intransitive verb meaning to impose a stipulation or condition, but as a transitive verb meaning to furnish or supply -- "The examples provided with these rules assume that A and B are arrays of the same shape and type."

It's still a good question though. Which pairs of unpacked array operand types are compatible with == and != ?

-- Brad

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Paul Graham
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 1:38 PM
To: sv-bc
Subject: [sv-bc] Equality operators on unpacked arrays

The lrm says that two unpacked arrays may be compared with == or != provided the arrays have "the same shape and type". Is this to say that the arrays must be assignment compatible?

Paul

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Nov 24 14:29:21 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 24 2010 - 14:31:52 PST