Re: [sv-bc] Interface use case examples

From: Peter Flake <flake@elda.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon Sep 13 2010 - 02:35:10 PDT

Jonathan,

Thank you for re-explaining my idea so clearly. My thoughts about
the modport name are that it does not form part of the signature for
compatibility purposes. However any change of name must be explicit,
e.g. given in the port connection list.

I am also happy with your proposal to allow modports to stand alone
in a package. The reason for my proposal is that I think it needs
less re-work and therefore has a better chance of being
implemented. We need to hear from the vendors.

Peter Flake

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Sep 13 02:35:42 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 13 2010 - 02:38:44 PDT