Hi,
> >On slide 3, the statement "Votes receive weight proportional
> to priority"
> >is somewhat ambiguous.
>
> [Matt Maidment] I agree. I show the raw scores at some point to bring
> to light the level to which issues received many votes so I wanted to
> at least provide some intuition into how a score of 283
> resulted without
> showing the formula. If you prefer I show the formula, I can do that.
> I will try to come up with an alternative phrase. If you have a
> suggestion, I am open to considering it.
"according to" is as ambiguous as "proportional to", but it is not misleading.
> >The word "comprehend" in "Top-25 does not comprehend effort
> or schedule"
> >probably should be something else.
> [Matt Maidment] I'm looking for a short bullet to emphasize
> that BC does
> not yet know if the Top-25 can be completed in the time
> allotted for 1800-2012.
> I will try to come up with an alternative phrase, if you have
> something
> to suggest, I'd appreciate that.
How about replacing "comprehend" with "consider"?
> >On slide 7, on addressing items not in Top-25, I would
> propose that the
> >sub-committee be allowed to address an additional issue if a
> proposer comes
> >with a proposal that is complete or at least almost complete.
>
> [Matt Maidment] That's not something we discussed in the BC
> meeting and
> I know of at least some in the BC (myself and Brad among
> them) who strongly
> disagree with this. Please raise it in the 1800 WG or pass it to Dany
> to raise.
Understood.
Note that there is a difference between bringing up an issue for discussion or presenting only an very initial proposal and presenting a detailed, more or less final, proposal.
> >Another question is how to relate to new issues that will
> come up in the
> >future. It is reasonable to assume that there will be arise
> some issues
> >that will be considered urgent.
>
> [Matt Maidment] I think that's covered by the questions already made.
The wording "What is WG position on addressing items not in Top-25?" is likely to be understood as referring to issues that have already been brought up, and people may not think about the fact that new issues may also come up.
Shalom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed May 12 07:30:35 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 12 2010 - 07:32:56 PDT