[sv-bc] RE: Posted draft of Top-25 Presentation to 1800 WG

It's not out of the realm of possibility for SV-BC, but not currently a priority.
The 1800 WG is the right place to begin resolution of this issues.

I request this be part of the SV-AC report-out to the 1800 WG.

Matt

--
Matt Maidment
mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com
 
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Korchemny, Dmitry
>Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 1:07 AM
>To: Maidment, Matthew R; sv-bc@eda.org
>Cc: sv-ac@server.eda.org; KORPUSIK,NEIL; Karen Pieper; Even-haim, Daniel
>Subject: RE: Posted draft of Top-25 Presentation to 1800 WG
>
>Hi Matt,
>
>As I can see, the Mantis 3025 "Introduce elaboration-time function for type
>compatibility check" is not among 25 top priority issues of SV-BC. I
>believe that this enhancement is really important for checkers, while its
>implementation effort should not be big. This item by its nature belongs to
>the competence area of SV-BC, though its main usage is expected to be in
>checkers. Should SV-AC own this item?
>
>Thanks,
>Dmitry
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
>Maidment, Matthew R
>Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 8:34 AM
>To: sv-bc@eda.org
>Subject: [sv-bc] Posted draft of Top-25 Presentation to 1800 WG
>
>Have a look and send feedback.
>
>http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/SV-BC%20Scope%20for%201800-2012.pdf
>
>Thanks,
>
>Matt
>
>
>--
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.
>
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.