RE: [sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] Are variable-width part selects already part of the SV language? (Mantis 2684)

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker@intel.com>
Date: Mon May 10 2010 - 07:58:39 PDT

This is Mantis 1156.
It would be a very useful construct, but this is much easier to code correctly in a longer readable way, so it is closer to syntatic sugar than variable-width selects.
As you pointed out, in some cases, there is some overlap between them.

Shalom
 

> The existing operator for a mux is the conditional operator, but that
> uses the same select bit value to control all of the output bits. I
> have suggested before that it would be useful to have a bitwise
> conditional operator, where the select is a vector as wide as the
> inputs, and each bit of the select vector controls the selection of
> the corresponding bit of the output.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon May 10 08:00:05 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 10 2010 - 08:02:48 PDT