Actually my biggest concern is that I can't give *negative*
weight to anything. At best I can leave it as 0 which
is not a correct representation of my view on some of the items.
Gord.
Havlicek John-R8AAAU wrote:
> Hi Folks:
>
> I have some concern about the weighted average scheme for scoring the
> results of everyone's prioritizations.
>
> I had hoped that we would each be given a mass to distribute (like the
> lucky bucks doled out by Karen Pieper in the requirements gathering
> meeting) and that we could each distribute our mass as we saw fit.
>
> With the current scheme, if I have high priority on only a few items,
> there is no way for me to focus my mass on those items. Essentially, my
> input no longer counts.
>
> Can the mechanism be amended in some way to avoid this prejudice against
> persons with small numbers of items of key interest?
>
> Best regards,
>
> John Havlicek
>
>
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed May 5 10:46:28 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 05 2010 - 10:49:29 PDT