Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Re: implicit instantiation of top-level modules?
From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Date: Sat Jul 12 2003 - 12:15:33 PDT
But we have seen that to refer to a sibling,
you don't need the parent's module name.
The sibling's instance name is enough.
However, you CAN refer to a net or variable declared in the parent
by using the parent's module name.
Shalom
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Steven Sharp
wrote:
> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 18:27:45 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Steven Sharp <sharp@cadence.com>
> To: sharp@cadence.com, mac@verisity.com
> Cc: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com>, mac@verisity.com,
David.Rich@synopsys.com, sv-bc@eda.org, etf@boyd.com
> Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Re: implicit instantiation of top-level modules?
>
>
> >From: Michael McNamara <mac@verisity.com>
>
> >where indeed, this feature allows one to refer to a sibling, by using
> >one's parent's MODULE NAME followed by the sibling's INSTANCE NAME
> >rather than needing to know one's parents INSTANCE NAME.
>
> Yep, that looks like a reasonable use for it.
>
> Steven Sharp
> sharp@cadence.com
>
-- Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com Design & Reuse Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268 Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890 POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 441478
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Jul 12 2003 - 12:20:37 PDT