Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Re: implicit instantiation of top-level modules?
From: Eric Olson (eolson@cisco.com)
Date: Thu Jul 10 2003 - 14:56:46 PDT
Steven Sharp wrote:
> This does not work. Module names will only match ancestors. To match
> a sibling requires using an instance name. Note that with an ancestor,
> there is a unique match for the module name. There could be multiple
> siblings that were instances of the same module.
This is even more significant given IEEE 1364-2001 13.3.1.6 "use" clause.
There may be situations where the unbound instance's module name and
the cell name to which it is bound are different.
Will it remain true that root can contain exactly one config block
that completely specifes all top level modules with its "design" statement?
-- Eric Olson eolson@cisco.com 408-526-5530
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Jul 10 2003 - 14:58:00 PDT