[sv-bc] Re: 3.1 LRM vote

Subject: [sv-bc] Re: 3.1 LRM vote
From: Maidment, Matthew R (matthew.r.maidment@intel.com)
Date: Thu Apr 24 2003 - 12:50:11 PDT

Intel votes YES. 

--
Matt Maidment
mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com
  

-----Original Message-----
From: Srouji, Johny 
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 11:34 AM
To: sv-bc@eda.org
Cc: Vassilios.Gerousis@Infineon.Com
Subject: [sv-bc] [SV-BC] Process and schedule for final LRM vote - REMINDER

 

Hi All,

 

This is a second reminder that I need expecting your votes today by 5:00 pm
PDT. Please send your vote.

  

_ X _ YES __ NO    Approve sending the LRM (the work performed by SV-BC) to
the board for their approval.

 

 

Thanks,

 

--- Johny.

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Srouji, Johny 
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 9:02 PM
To: sv-bc@eda.org
Cc: Srouji, Johny; 'Karen'; 'Vassilios.Gerousis@infineon.com'
Subject: [SV-BC] Process and schedule for final LRM vote
Importance: High

 

Hi All,

 

Following the TCC meeting last Friday and David Smith note capturing the
voting process and schedule, I suggest that we follow a similar process for
our committee, as outlined below. I have also made some suggestions. Please
let me know ASAP if you have any comments or issues w/ this process.

 

*         We shall have the voting by EMAIL. If someone strongly feels we
should have a meeting for this, send me a note.

*         Voting must complete by 24 April (Thursday) at 5:00 pm (pacific). 

*         Based on the attendance rule of 3/4 last meetings - here is a list
of eligible voting members for SV-BC:

Johny Srouji (Intel), 

Karen Pieper (Synopsys), 

Gord Vreugdenhil (Synopsys), 

Brad Pierce (Synopsys), 

Francoise Martinolle (Cadence), 

Dan Jacobi (Intel), 

David Rich (Synopsys), 

Matt Maidment (Intel), 

 

Kevin Cameron (NSC) - OK attendance wise, but NSC is not an eligible member

*         All participants will vote by company (even non-eligible companies
due to attendance or not being Accellera members). This is desired to make
sure that all participant companies have a voice. non-eligible company votes
will not be counted but they will be tracked.

*         I suggest that each of the voting companies choose a
representative to submit their vote. Here is my suggestion for the eligible
voting companies:

Cadence: Francoise Martinolle 

Synopsis: David Rich

Intel: Matt Maidment

As for the non eligible companies:

NSC: Kevin Cameron

Sunburst Design: Cliff Cummings

Model Technology: Dennis Brophy

LCDM Engineering: Don Mills 

Verisity: Mike McNamara

Boyd Technology: Stefen Boyd

HMC: Heath Chambers

Fintronic: Alec F. Stanculescu

*         Please send your vote directly to me (johny.srouji@intel.com
<mailto:johny.srouji@intel.com> ) and to Karen Pieper
(Karen.Pieper@synopsys.com <mailto:Karen.Pieper@synopsys.com> ) 

*         The vote will be approved if 2/3s of the eligible companies vote
and approve. 

*         Each committee votes only on the work they have done (sections of
the LRM or content to sections) as a single vote that indicates the
committees work is to be sent to the board for acceptance.

*         The votes will be tallied on Friday.

Thanks,

 

--- Johny.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Apr 24 2003 - 13:05:18 PDT