Subject: RE: [sv-bc] RE: LRM Issues Review
From: David W. Smith (david.smith@synopsys.com)
Date: Thu Apr 10 2003 - 22:18:20 PDT
Thank you!
Regards
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Rich [mailto:David.Rich@Synopsys.COM]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 9:50 PM
To: David W. Smith
Cc: 'Srouji, Johny'; sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: Re: [sv-bc] RE: LRM Issues Review
David W. Smith wrote:
> LRM-50: So when do I get the "semantic check" verbiage to add to
> the LRM? Tommorrow is the last day.
>
Existing port connection sematics take care of this.
> LRM-52: So which is it? Leave it the way it is or remove the enum?
>
leave it. Existing sematic rules take care of it. DPI might need it also
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Apr 10 2003 - 22:15:59 PDT