Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Email voting on all open proposals closing 3/15/03
From: Dave Rich (David.Rich@synopsys.com)
Date: Thu Mar 13 2003 - 17:42:13 PST
>
>
> __Yes _X_No SV-BC30:
> _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/att-0284/06-Peter-action-items.txt_
Peter needs to give instructions on exactly where the paragraph an
example for (1) needs to be added.
> _X_Yes __No SV-BC70: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0477.html_
Just the issue related to SV-BC70
>
> _X_Yes __No SV-BC72: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0500.html_
> _X_Yes __No SV-BC73: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0508.html_
I don't agree with Dan's suggested amendment on white space. However, He
can raise that as a new issue.
>
> _X_Yes __No SV-BC74: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0511.html__
>
> __X_Yes __No SV-BC39: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0514.html_
> _X_Yes __No SV-BC81: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0518.html_
> _X_Yes __No SV-BC78: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0530.html_
> _X_Yes __No SV-BC80: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0534.html_
> _X_Yes __No SV-BC81-1: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0535.html__
>
> ___Yes _X_No SV-BC82: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0538.html_
Superseded by SV-84. Close this one
>
> __Yes _X_No SV-BC83: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0539.html_
Need to specify a section on where this goes
>
> _X_Yes __No SV-BC59: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0556.html_
I don't think this needs more discussion. We have runtime errors. There
are no runtime warnings.
Whether or not this construct should produce a message is another issue.
>
> __Yes __No SV-BC84: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0557.html_
Abstain
>
> __Yes __No SV-BC84-1: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0558.html_
Abstain
> _
>
> __X_Yes __No SV-BC79: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0564.html_
> _X_Yes __No SV-BC42-16: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0565.html_
> __Yes _X_No SV-BC42-23: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0566.html_
Proposal replaced by P-0567 and covered in 42-24
>
> _X_Yes __No SV-BC42-24: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0567.html_
> _X_Yes __No SV-BC42-33: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0568.html_
I agree to Removing the variable_assignment from my original proposal.
Suggested by Dan in P-0632
> _
>
> __X_Yes __No SV-BC75: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0569.html_
I agree to striking the last sentence that starts with "Some tools"
See P-0583
>
> _X_Yes __No SV-BC26-2: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0576.html_
> _X_Yes __No SV-BC42-11: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0579.html_
> __Yes _X_No SV-BC21-1: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0580.html_
There are a few suggestions in P-0627 that need to be incorporated to
the original proposal
> _ _ <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0580.html>_X_Yes __No SV-BC91:
> _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0590.html
>
> __X_Yes __No SV-BC62c: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0591.html_
> _X_Yes __No SV-BC65:
> _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/att-0592/02-ArrayStruct_nobars.pdf
> __X_Yes __No SV-BC18f:
> _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/att-0595/01-port_connection_rules.pdf
> __X_Yes __No SV-BC19-60: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0598.html
> ___Yes _X_No SV-BC86: _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0608.html_
Compatibility with C is important when possible
> _
>
> _ <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0608.html>__Yes _X_No SV-BC69:
> _http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0610.html_
This is too big a change for SV-BC
> _
> _
-- -- Dave Rich Principal Engineer, CAE, VTG Tel: 650-584-4026 Cell: 510-589-2625 DaveR@Synopsys.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Mar 13 2003 - 17:42:55 PST