RE: [sv-bc] Email voting on all open proposals closing 3/15/03


Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Email voting on all open proposals closing 3/15/03
From: Jacobi, Dan (dan.jacobi@intel.com)
Date: Sun Mar 09 2003 - 06:12:14 PST


Hello All.
 
Some comments :
 
1. SV-BC-81 (marked as P-0518) was accepted on 03/03/03 - I do not think we
need to re-vote on this issue.
 
2. SV-BC-73 (marked as P-0508) I think a foot note should be added disabling
the us of a white space after
                    the tick
 
    changing the proposal to :
    ADD
        implicit_base_binary_number11 ::= '0 | '1 | 'X | 'x | 'Z | 'z
                                                < upper case 11> < all other
charters and punctuations in bold>

    Under foot notes ADD
        11) The tick (') in implicit_base_binary_number shall not be
preceded or followed by white_space.
 
3.SV-BC-81-1 (P-0535) both occurrences of the word output are in bold
quoting the BNF:
 
    output_declaration ::=
    output [ port_type ] list_of_port_identifiers
    | output data_type list_of_variable_port_identifiers
 
4.SV-BC-84(P-0557) should be dropped it is covered by SV-BC-19-60 (P-0598,
also standing for a vote in this E-mail)
 
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Karen Pieper [mailto:Karen.Pieper@synopsys.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 1:03 AM
To: sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-bc] Email voting on all open proposals closing 3/15/03

Hi All,

Here are all of the remaining proposals, which we have not been able to
vote on in committee. Here is the process that we agreed on, during
our last F2F meeting, Jan 22nd:

* Whoever does not vote, will be assumed as not objecting
* If an eligible voting member votes against it, the topic will be
brought up for a discussion
        In the last meeting, we agreed that an email discussion may take
        place over issues where there is a no vote and if the issue is
        resolved (potentially with a friendly amendment) a member may
        change their vote to yes.

The voting will close at 5pm PST next Saturday 3/15/03.

I have a couple of requests:

* Please submit your vote below, as YES or NO. If you vote NO, please
come up w/ a counter proposal and/or modifications/reasons, and submit it by

Mar 15th
* It would be useful to get all votes (to be used as a straw poll, if
needed)

Thanks,

Karen

__Yes __No SV-BC30:
<http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/att-0284/06-Peter-action-items.txt>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/att-0284/06-Peter-action-items.txt
__Yes __No SV-BC70: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0477.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0477.html
__Yes __No SV-BC72: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0500.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0500.html
__Yes __No SV-BC73: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0508.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0508.html
__Yes __No SV-BC74: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0511.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0511.html

__Yes __No SV-BC39: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0514.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0514.html
__Yes __No SV-BC81: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0518.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0518.html
__Yes __No SV-BC78: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0530.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0530.html
__Yes __No SV-BC80: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0534.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0534.html
__Yes __No SV-BC81-1: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0535.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0535.html

__Yes __No SV-BC82: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0538.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0538.html
__Yes __No SV-BC83: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0539.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0539.html
__Yes __No SV-BC59: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0556.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0556.html
__Yes __No SV-BC84: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0557.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0557.html
__Yes __No SV-BC84-1: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0558.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0558.html

__Yes __No SV-BC79: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0564.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0564.html
__Yes __No SV-BC42-16: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0565.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0565.html
__Yes __No SV-BC42-23: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0566.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0566.html
__Yes __No SV-BC42-24: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0567.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0567.html
__Yes __No SV-BC42-33: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0568.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0568.html

__Yes __No SV-BC75: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0569.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0569.html
__Yes __No SV-BC26-2: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0576.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0576.html
__Yes __No SV-BC42-11: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0579.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0579.html
__Yes __No SV-BC21-1: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0580.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0580.html
__Yes __No SV-BC91: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0590.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0590.html

__Yes __No SV-BC62c: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0591.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0591.html
__Yes __No SV-BC65:
<http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/att-0592/02-ArrayStruct_nobars.pdf>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/att-0592/02-ArrayStruct_nobars.pdf
__Yes __No SV-BC18f:
<http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/att-0595/01-port_connection_rules.pdf>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/att-0595/01-port_connection_rules.pdf
__Yes __No SV-BC19-60: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0598.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0598.html
__Yes __No SV-BC86: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0608.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0608.html

__Yes __No SV-BC69: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0610.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0610.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Mar 09 2003 - 06:13:01 PST