Subject: RE: always_comb semantics
From: Karen Pieper (Karen.Pieper@synopsys.com)
Date: Thu Oct 03 2002 - 13:57:32 PDT
>
> Can I infer then, that a simulator should treat always_ff,
> always_comb and always in exactly the same manner as one another?
Again, as Gord's indicated earlier, the always_* constructs are different
because
The sensitivity list is calculated differently.
The initialization is calculated differently.
The error checking is more strict.
Thus, the simulation behavior is different.
> If so, then I would support making this distinction an attribute
> rather than a new construct in the language.
Sorry, I don't think this is that easy......
Karen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Oct 03 2002 - 14:00:55 PDT