KMLM List
View email archives for the history of this mailing list.
|
|
|
|
systemc-forum - RE: [systemc-forum] CreateFiber Vs CreateFiberEx
|
Message Thread:
Previous |
Next
|
- To: "Philipp A. Hartmann" <philipp.hartmann@xxxxxxxx>
- From: "A, Nizamudheen" <niz@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:54:04 +0530
- Cc: "systemc-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <systemc-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Send Email to systemc-forum@lists.systemc.org:
- Send new message
- Reply to this message
|
Thanks Philip.
When is the next public release planned?
Regards,
Nizam
-----Original Message-----
From: Philipp A. Hartmann [mailto:philipp.hartmann@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2010 4:09 PM
To: A, Nizamudheen
Cc: systemc-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [systemc-forum] CreateFiber Vs CreateFiberEx
Nizam,
thanks for your report.
This issue is known and will be fixed in the next public release of the
OSCI SystemC implementation.
Greetings from Oldenburg,
Philipp
On 26/11/10 11:26, A, Nizamudheen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question in the OSCI SystemC reference implementation. The SystemC
> kernel sc_cor_fiber.cpp file uses CreateFiber call to create a thread on
> Windows OS. Is there a reason to use CreateFiber rather than CreateFiberEx?
> CreateFiberEx gives a fine-grain control to fix the stack-size of the OS
> thread/fiber being created (the CreateFiber also takes a stack-size
> parameter, but in Windows OS, it is being overridden by the executable stack
> size value).
>
> Regards,
> Nizam
>
--
Philipp A. Hartmann
Hardware/Software Design Methodology Group
OFFIS Institute for Information Technology
R&D Division Transportation * FuE-Bereich Verkehr
Escherweg 2 * 26121 Oldenburg * Germany * http://www.offis.de/
Phone/Fax: +49-441-9722-420/282 * PGP: 0x9161A5C0 * Skype: phi.har
|
|